Live Free Or Die said…

Roe vs Wade is hostile to the Constitution. Activist federal judges have committed serious offenses against the U.S. Constitution with their perversions of the 14th Amendment.

They have evaded the constitutional limits on their power to hear cases by fabricating, just making up individual “constitutional rights” from the 14th Amendment so that they can then pretend that the cases “arise under the Constitution”, thereby claiming “federal question” jurisdiction!

In Roe v. Wade (1973), seven judges on the supreme Court said a “…right of privacy…founded in the Fourteenth Amendment’s concept of personal liberty and restrictions upon state action…” (p. 153) makes unconstitutional a State Law making abortion a criminal offense! Those seven judges just made up a “constitutional privacy right” which they said was in the 14th Amendment and which they said prohibits States from outlawing abortion! They lied

The Original Intent of the 14th Amendment.
Let’s look at the 14th Amendment, which activist federal judges have seized upon to circumvent the FACT that the U.S. Constitution shows that jurisdiction over abortion, and marriage is reserved by the States or the People.
Section 1 of the 14th Amendment (ratified 1868) says:
“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

What does this mean? Harvard Professor Raoul Berger’s meticulously documented book, Government by Judiciary: The Transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment, proves by means of thousands of quotes from the Congressional Debates, that the purpose of Sec. 1 of the 14th Amendment was to extend citizenship to freed slaves and to protect them from southern Black Codes which denied them basic rights of citizenship. Roe vs Wade was a massive power grab AND JUDICIAL TYRANNY by the supreme court.

Screen Shot 2018-06-29 at 2.17.46 PM

By Nancy Thorner – 

President Donald Trump was catapulted into office on the pledge to crack down on illegal immigration.  As of 2017, FAIR estimates the number of illegal aliens in the US to be approximately 12.5 million; however, estimating the size and characteristics of the illegal alien population is an inexact science.

Anyone claiming to have calculated a definitive number should be looked upon skeptically, as there is no central database of illegal aliens.  Additionally, the Department of Homeland Security only counts those who enter and leave in a lawful manner. Those who evade immigration authorities or sneak across the border are not counted.

Since 2016, some 110,000 children have entered the U.S. illegally and been released, along with 200,000 Central American families caught sneaking across the border.  Since the dramatic surge of border crossings in 2013, the federal government has placed more than 180,000 unaccompanied minors with parents or other adult sponsors who are expected to care for the children and help them attend school while they seek legal status in immigration court.

As to why a solution can’t be found, members of both parties favor open borders — Democrats want votes and Republicans want cheap labor — but Democrats and the media are doing what they always do, driving emotions rather than rational thought. Thus the immigration war has reached a frenzied peak in media hype.  Breitbart provides nine examples where MS-13 gang members — the murderous El Salvadorian gang that Democrats defended last month — used these immigration loopholes to try to enter the U.S. in hopes they would eventually be released.

The lies have also never been greater, as when the story broke about the detained immigrant minors. The leftist media blamed Trump, neglecting to mention the incident happened during the Obama years

Every liberal media outlet and personality is being used.  A slew of Hollywood celebrities took to Twitter to criticize President Donald Trump after he ended the policy of separating illegal immigrant adults from minors apprehended at the southern border, including actor Tom Arnold.  The result has been escalating violence and intimidation against anyone who would stop the sacred right of foreigners to ignore our laws and our borders.

Additionally, Sarah Sanders gets kicked out of a restaurant. A group of protesters gathered outside Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen’s Virginia townhouse chanting “no justice, no sleep” and blaring audio of immigrant children crying.  Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi was harassed when she attempted to attend a screening of the Mister Rogers movie, Won’t You Be My Neighbor.

California Democrat Rep. Maxine Waters is creating a dangerous situation when calling for total social warfare against the entire Trump administration.  She cheered on those who have attacked or rebuffed them at restaurants and their homes and said at the speech, “Let’s stay the course, let’s make sure we show up wherever we have to show up.”

Burt Prelutsky contributes

Burt Prelutsky is a friend, a TV screenwriter, humor columnist, movie critic, and author of eight books, as well as having his own subscription list where he posts six witty political commentaries per week.  If you care to subscribe contact Burt Prelutsky at  If anyone is in Los Angeles during the week of July 13-19, contact Mr. Prelutsky for details on how to attend his movie,“Angels on Tap”, a delightful comedy about a barroom full of disgruntled angels. You are sure to recognized many of the actors from popular sit-com TV shows.

There was a time not that long ago when the United States was a magnet for the best and the brightest.  There was even a term for it.  It was called the Brain Drain.  Inventors, research chemists, nuclear scientists, accomplished writers, composers and musicians, couldn’t wait to leave Europe and Asia for the greater opportunities awaiting them in America.

That was then, this is now.  Somewhere along the way, Congress decided that we had more than enough brains, and that what we needed were steady streams of cheap labor and more potential Democrats.  If either group included terrorists, it didn’t matter very much because the lawmakers were well-protected; at least until a Bernie Sanders supporter decided to shoot up a baseball diamond.

And so we threw open our doors to Castro’s most vicious felons, Haiti’s AIDS-infected victims, Mexico’s unskilled millions of terminally unemployed, and unvetted refugees from the Middle East.

Worst of all, both parties took part in this madness.  The Democrats saw it as a way to inflate their registration rolls, the Republicans saw it as a way to placate their major donors who never want to see the pool of cheap labor dry up.

When questioned about their motives, both parties start yammering about ours being a nation of immigrants and pretending that Emma Goldman’s schmaltzy poem, “The New Colossus” — which has been immortalized simply because some dumb cluck decided it should be attached at the base of the Statue of Liberty — is the final word when it comes to our immigration policy.

When it comes to these foreign trespassers, the derangement syndrome is so wide-spread that even the usually silent Laura Bush, one of only two Texas residents who are protected 24/7 by the Secret Service, felt compelled to announce that separating lawbreakers from their children was breaking her heart.

In order to cut our way through the flapdoodle, we have to acknowledge a few facts.

One, children in America are separated from their parents on an hourly basis, either because their fathers or mothers are headed off to jail or on a military mission.  That’s life, and I don’t believe that Mrs. Bush’s heart breaks each and every time it happens.

Two, it is not Donald Trump or the Border Patrol that makes the decision to risk having family members separated.  It is the parents who decide to either cross the border illegally themselves or to send the kids ahead to ease the way to follow them via chain migration.

Three, as we have now discovered, the adults who accompany the kids aren’t always their parents.  They are nogootniks who use the children as props because they know that the way the law is written, the kids can only be held for 20 days and the authorities are likely to simultaneously release their “parents” into the general population, relying on an empty promise that they’ll return for a court date.

There is a reason, even if such bleeding hearts as Jeff Flake and Susan Collins choose to ignore it, why there has been a 314% spike this year in the number of fraudulent cases of adults entering the country with children they either abducted, purchased or borrowed, who are no more related to the kids than I am.

If I could figure out a way to keep birds from landing on it, my border wall would be an electric fence.  I wouldn’t be hiring more judges to adjudicate cases at the border.  There’s nothing to adjudicate.  If you’d like to come to the United States legally, fine; fill out the paperwork and take your place in line.

I fully understand the desire of poor people in Mexico and Central America to come here.  But I also understand poor people in Africa, Asia and Europe, wanting to do the same.  But I see no reason to treat Latinos better than everyone else simply because they don’t have to cross an ocean to get here.

And I certainly see no good reason to roll out the welcome mat simply because the Democratic politicians want to import voters and Republican business owners want easy access to cheap labor.

If it were up to me, I would treat those trying to sneak into the country the same way I would treat some scumbag trying to sneak into my home.

Congress flunks problem solving

Most people will describe a “problem” in terms of something that needs to be done. That leads to a lot of confusion and generally ineffective solutions. In business and the sciences, a “problem” is best described in terms of some event or observation that should happen but doesn’t or something that happens unexpectedly. Problem solving can only start when you have defined the problem.  It involves a search for the root cause and what can be done to change it.

In politics there is no consensus of the true nature of any problem, only the opportunity to blame the other side for its consequences.  If you do solve a problem, you’d have to invent another one to take its place in the political discourse.

President Trump knows how to identify and solve problems. To the Creatures of the Washington Swamp, that’s tantamount to taking their jobs away, and they’re not having it.


By Nancy Thorner & Ed Ingold – 

A recent commentary in the Wall Street Journal, “Mueller’s Fruit of the Poisonous Tree”, concluded that it makes no difference how honorable Mueller is, his investigation is tainted by the bias that attended its origin in 2016.

As Roger Kimball wrote on June 19, 2018 about the 568-page IG report, A Comedy of Corruption? Or a Bureaucratic Horror Show?:

If the stakes were not so high, the 568-page report issued last week by the Justice Department Office of the Inspector General (“A Review of Various Actions by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Department of Justice in Advance of the 2016 Election”) might be seen as a species of comedy, something out of Plautus, perhaps (starring Peter Strzok as the Miles Gloriosus and Lisa Page as Philocomasium), or Dickens’s Little Dorrit with its Office of Circumlocution .  Note: The report “did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative decisions we reviewed.

At PJ Media  Andrew Klavan observed, not to have found any evidence of political bias is simply inspector-generalese for, “No one confessed or left a paper trail.”

Kimberly Strassel was also right in her recent column for the Wall Street Journal of June 14, 2018, “Insubordination and Bias at FBI (The inspector general report is careful in its conclusions, but damning on the facts”), when she concluded that the IG report is dripping with evidence of political bias.

Prelutsky Provides Dose of Humor

Burt Prelutsky is a CA tv screenwriter, humor columnist, movie critic, author of eight books, as well as having his own website where he posts six witty political commentaries per week though subscription at  burtprelutsky@icloud.comHere is what Burt Prelutsky had to say about the recently released IG report: 

“Although I had looked forward to the Inspector General of the Justice Department, Michael Horowitz, and the Director of the FBI, Christopher Wray, being questioned by a Senate committee, I wound up disappointed, as I so often am by any activity undertaken by Washington bureaucrats.

For my part, Horowitz had already made himself a laughingstock by turning in a nearly 600-page report detailing a two-year campaign of partisan bias conducted by members of the Deep State – a group of traitors that included, but was not limited to James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page — to prevent Donald Trump from winning the election; and when that failed, resorting to a backup plan to undermine his administration and get him impeached.

But after all that, Horowitz somehow concluded that the plot had nothing to do with partisan bias.  It was as if he were channeling James Comey, who, in 2016, read off a list of federal crimes that Hillary Clinton had committed before concluding that no prosecutor could possibly have grounds for indicting her.

As for Christopher Wray, he could well serve as Central Casting’s idea of the perfect bureaucratic wimp, the sort of person who wakes up every morning thinking how to best spend the day covering his ass.

When questioned about the part the FBI had played in the resistance movement, this federal toady played down the Bureau’s involvement by reminding the committee that only a small number of individuals had been engaged in the traitorous activity.

Fortunately, Sen. Orrin Hatch was there to brush aside the frivolous defense by reminding Wray that the small number happened “to include the Director of the FBI, the Deputy Director of the FBI and the lead investigator of both the Clinton investigation and the Russian collusion investigation.”

But, apparently, we are all supposed to breathe a sigh of relief now that Wray has ordered the 35,000 agents to attend classes that will explain to them why people who carry guns, badges and federal warrants, should try to make every effort to avoid exhibiting partisan bias, at least during working hours.

Best of all, once they complete the program, they’ll be able to find employment selling latte grandes at the local Starbuck.”

Clinton E-mail Fiasco

As to the handling of the Clinton e-mails, the reason FBI Director Comey announced a renewed investigation of the Clinton Emails just days before the election has not been completely explained and probably never will be. The Inspector’s General report described it as a “breach of protocol,” and hubris on Comey’s part for concealing his intentions from the AG Lynch. This is an accurate assessment, but probably not the entire story. In any investigation, one of the first questions asked is “Who stands to benefit?” From this point the Clinton Email investigation twists and turns like the plot of an Agatha Christy novel, only we are still waiting for someone to confess in the penultimate scene, when all of the parties are assembled.

Clinton and the Democrats still claim that the 11th hour news conference cost them the 2016 election. It certainly didn’t help; however, the effect would have been much worse if someone else had leaked the information. There would have been a storm of reports, denials and opinions, dominating the news cycle for two weeks or more. As we know all too well, it’s not the crime, it’s the coverup, stupid!

The IG’s report makes that situation a little clearer. According to this report, the upper echelon of the FBI had a network of serial leakers and still do. The connection between the FBI and mainstream media is that unidentified individuals received emoluments from the media, including tickets to various events, to lubricate this flow of information. The discovery of thousands of emails on Huma Abedin’s computer, through the prosecution of her husband, Anthony Weiner, for sex crimes, occurred in September, a month before Comey’s fateful news release. The District Attorney of New York conveyed this information to the FBI (Peter Strzok). A month is a long time to keep a secret in Washington, and it was increasingly likely that it would be leaked to the press, either out of conscience or hubris.

While Comey’s news conference damaged Clinton’s campaign, far more damage would have occurred had it leaked. The clock was ticking. The thread on Damacles’ sword was starting to fray.

FBI Stonewalls

Trey Gowdy (R-SC), Chairman, House Oversight Committee, not only slammed the FBI based on the IG report, but he also went after the DOJ & FBI for not complying with the Committee request for the documents from Clinton Email investigation.  Gowdy told “Fox News Sunday” that “the full panoply of constitutional weapons available to the people’s house” are on the table, including contempt of Congress. “I don’t want the drama; I want the documents,” Gowdy added.

The FBI and Justice keep digging themselves a deeper hole in the name of a cover up. This only makes it worse as the cat is out of the bag thanks to IG Horowitz damaging report. The notion being circulated about there being no bias is pure hogwash.  Read here the seven key takeaways from bombshell DOJ Watchdog Report into Hillary e-mail probe

Instead of a Trump/Russian investigation, it should have been the expansion of the Clinton server scandal that should have been front and center instead of the focus on Trump; thanks to Strzok’s animus and bias.

The bias and animus exhibited by the high- level FBI lawyers and agents are having their unwanted and unintended consequences of tainting the Mueller investigation, so carefully planned as the insurance policy and the “we will stop him” pledge. The consequence so unwanted and unexpected, places a wet blanket over the Mueller ever widening probe of Trump and related parties. Bias and animus so blinded Strzok and Page, his concubine, they lost their bearings and ignored what they learned in law school, they may have gifted Trump and those caught up in the web of the Russian investigation, by rendering Mueller’s work moot.

Time will tell, but how ironic that the prime advocate for the take down of Trump is in fact, the key player in his liberation from the Russian probe and of those around him, Flynn, Manafort, Papadopoulos, and even Cohen, is none other than Strzok himself?

Oh by the way, where is the evidence? Just asking.


Carl Lambrecht said…

I was impressed the quality of people coming to this meeting.
The Ray True award to Jeanne Ives was the high point for me.
Real Americans both of them.
Love Saves Lives
Carl Lambrecht

Screen Shot 2018-06-15 at 3.39.14 PM

By Nancy Thorner & Ed Ingold – 

It’s all coming together with the release Thursday of the Inspector’s General Report on the Clinton investigation, A Review of Various Actions by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Department Justice in Advance of the 2016 Election.  Read it for yourself here.

Among other things, it confirms that there is a political wing in the FBI which feels it has the right to act as kingmaker in national elections. From other reports, similar functions exist in the DOJ, the CIA and NSA. If this sounds familiar, look back at the old Soviet Union, which took political action to extreme in the KGB (internal security) and GRU (foreign intelligence), and to a great extent, their current versions under Putin.

The FBI as a political entity is nothing new. J. Edgar Hoover headed the FBI since its inception in 1935, and its predecessor since 1924 – a total of nearly 50 years, ending only in his death in 1972. According to Harry Truman in 1948, ” … [W]e want no Gestapo or secret police. The FBI is tending in that direction. They are dabbling in sex-life scandals and plain blackmail. J. Edgar Hoover would give his right eye to take over, and all congressmen and senators are afraid of him.” Hoover owes his longevity in that capacity precisely because he held “dirt” on nearly all politicians, including Presidents.

It is becoming clear that President Obama weaponized the DOJ and intelligence agencies against his political foes, especially the Republicans once Donald Trump gained the nomination. Eric Holder, AG, took the point at every opportunity to blame police actions on racism, swell as attempts to reform the election system and immigration. His successor, Loretta Lynch, mostly stood back and watched.

The idea that the director of the FBI would have a 10-year term, was to shield the director from influence of the patronage system, while keeping the term short enough to forestall another Hoover-like dynasty. It’s not working out that way. The real dynasty exists in the top-level executives in the layers immediately below the Director.

These are scary times, and our liberty is at risk. According to the Republicans, the IG report confirms their greatest fears, while the Democrats dismiss it as irrelevant. The difference is that Republicans cite page and paragraph, while the Democrats assume their followers will never read beyond the headlines. We can change that once there is time to digest the real content.


By Nancy Thorner and Ed Ingold – 

The month of May closed with amazing news on the economy. It looks unstoppable and signals the best recovery since World War II.

Instead of celebrating the incredible economic activity, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi had this to say:

“May’s jobs report shows that strong employment numbers mean little to the families hit with soaring new costs under the Republicans’ watch.”

She added: Republicans’ cruel, cynical health care sabotage campaign is already spiking families’ premiums by double digits and pushing millions off their coverage, according to the nonpartisan CBO.  Big Pharma continues to hoard the benefits of the GOP tax scam, using their handouts to further enrich executives and shareholders instead of lowering prescription drug costs for seniors and sick kids.  At the same time, the President’s reckless policies are exploding gas prices, wiping out the few meager gains that some families should have received from the GOP tax scam, as wages remain stagnant. 

Pelosi further claimed: “Democrats will never stop fighting for the hard-working middle-class families who are the backbone of our nation.”

The Atlanta Fed forecasts a big boost in private sector fixed investment, which includes capital investment in machinery, land, buildings, vehicles, and technology. Earlier, the Atlanta Fed saw this growing at 4.6 percent. But following the release Friday of a construction spending report from the U.S. Census Bureau and the Manufacturing ISM Report On Business from the Institute for Supply Management, this was upgraded to 5.4 percent growth.

Unemployment is 3.8%, the third month at 4% or less. Employment participation is at a 20 year high. Black unemployment is 5.9%, down from 6.6%. There are currently more manufacturing jobs (aka high paying) than suitable candidates. In that the GDP was 3.6%, it is now projected to reach 4.7% in the next month or two. This is all the continuation of President Obama’s policies, or is it?

It was on January 1, 2016, that a steel worker union official asked President Barack Obama at a June 1 town hall in Elkhart, Indiana, about job losses at a plant run by Carrier, an air conditioning manufacturer that recently announced plans to move jobs from Indiana to Mexico. He replied that some jobs “are just not going to come back,” while others are in flux or rebounding.

Having made this gloom statement about job growth, by December 6th, 2017 former President Barack Obama was taking credit for the economic growth that was occurring at the time under President Trump, when he told an adoring crowd at a Chicago climate summit that despite “resistance at every step of the way,” his administration’s efforts to fight climate change resulted in a better economy.

“As we took these actions, we saw the U.S. economy grow consistently,” Obama said. “We saw the longest streak of job creation in American history by far — a streak that still continues, by the way.”

He then added a zinger: “Thanks Obama.”

Obama made Trump’s job easy in achieving most of the gains simply by reversing (or erasing) those destructive policies.

  • Re-authorization and completion of at least two major oil pipelines.
  • Reversing restrictions on off-shore oil extraction.
  • Easing restrictions on coal mining and use.
  • Cutting corporate tax rates in half, and encouraging re-patriotization of profits held abroad.
  • Re-negotiating foreign trade agreements toward balanced versions.

Similar improvements have been made by Trump on the international scene, including the following:

  • Obama’s toxic relationship with Russia led to last minute (literally) imposition of sanctions, which Trump delayed as a way to have better leverage when relations with Russia reached various crises.
  • Renewed relationships with our main ally in the Middle-East, Israel, and improved relationships with Egypt and Jordan (snubbed by Obama).
  • Abandonment of the Obama/Kerry agreement-for-the-sake-of-agreement (never ratified) with Iran in favor of increased sanctions.
  • Tough stance on China’s trade imbalance and theft of technology.
  • Staring down North Korea’s reckless threats, bringing Kim Jung-Un to the negotiating table (at Kim’s request).
  • Re-gaining all the territory in Iraq claimed by ISIS and killing most of their leaders and 90% of their followers.

The May jobs report is great news for everyone — except Democrats running for office.

  • Voters who are employed are historically more likely to favor incumbents than those who are out of work.
  • With the jobless rate now down to 3.8 percent, Democrats in 435 House districts and 35 Senate races face a major challenge as they try to unseat Republican majorities in both chambers.

The GDP could reach 4.8% in the second quarter of 2018. Unemployment is at 3.8%, the lowest since 1996, and North Korea is at the bargaining table next week. Trump’s approval is at 49%, greater than that of any president since Ronald Reagan (and 5% better than Obama). Yet the Never Trumpers of both parties are working at a fever pitch against him.

Donald Trump’s success in his Presidency is due to a combination of reversing negative policies and innovation using techniques foreign to career bureaucrats. All of this is in the face of unrelenting criticism of every move, word and misspelling, and a deep state bent on his destruction. Under President Trump the term “Red Line” has taken a more literal meaning, and our enemies take notice.