Wednesday, April 29, 2020

Monday, April 27, 2020

Article One of this 2-part series concluded with Alex Newman addressing Question 4 to Dr. Shiva about the nature of Event 201 on October 18, 2019 in New York City.

Newman (Question #5): Recently there was a documentary about the origin of the Communist party’s virus, that it may have been engineered in a lab, possibly the one in Wuhan that got funding from the United States. Was it engineered as a bio-weapon or was it a natural thing?

Shiva: It could have been engineered, but this is not an easy thing to do. It’s unlikely, however, that the virus was developed in a random fashion. If it were engineered, not to be ruled out is that COVID-19 could be part of a bio-media warfare weapon.

Our immune systems are quite resistant, yet the importance of clean water, clean air, and clean food is never discussed.

Newman (Question #6): What about flattering the curve, social distancing, or doing nothing like Sweden? Were they legitimate? responses?

Shiva: Washing hands and good hygiene are always positive responses.

There is, however, inconsistency. With H1N1 in 2009 there were 60 thousand deaths, yet there were no shutdowns. Where was the yardstick of equality?

The history of the medical profession is to find some virus and then tie it to some disease. Scurvy, first believed to be a virus, was later attributed to the lack of Vitamin C.

Will the treatment of the Wuhan virus now become the new criteria for other infectious diseases?

Newman (Question #7): Now that progressive groups are using the coronavirus to advance their agendas, is this a racist virus? Might there be a racial component?

Shiva: Yes and NO. Blacks in Africa are getting tons of Vitamin D from the sun digging up root vegetables to eat, which contain Vitamin A.

In NYC and throughout this nation, African Americans are compromised because of a high rate of diabetes and other pre-existing conditions. As in NYC and other large inner cities, found is a preponderance of compromised African Americans living close together in a state of squalor.

The fault lies with affirmative action policies. Liberals never addressed the important issue of infrastructure in inner cities for poor whites and blacks (the basic physical and organizational structures and facilities (e.g. buildings, roads, power supplies) needed for the operation of a society or enterprise).

Liberals really don’t care about racism, but they will use it for their own advantage. People who talk about racism are likely the racists themselves.

Newman (Question 7): What are your top concern s. Thing s that would be on your radar if you were in the Senate

Shiva: There are three areas of concern which can be found on my website, Shiva4Senate.com: Truth, Freedom, and Health. Dr. Shiva has proposed a legislative act for each of his three concerns.

Because truth is science, we need the Citizen Science Act to take power away from the scientific community to prevent a few people from controlling all of the science and potentially that of the world. It would be funded through taxes to support science. The data given to public institutions would need to be revealed for evaluation by the public.

We have outsourced science to a few sets of people who don’t even practice the scientific method, but who instead rely on scientific consensus. This is due to the amount of grant money given to universities, whose grants are contingent upon them coming up with data that supports the establishment’s position, not that of real scientists. Science has been taken over by academia who are basically business folk.

The 1970’s was a vibrant time for the post office. Now it is failing. Let the postal service do its job by being the foundation for public comments by offering public comments through a Digital Rights Act.

The public would be willing to pay $50 to have a choice not to go on Facebook or YouTube, but to instead have a service that is protected by the people and for the people.

The Health Rights Act would eliminate the middleman to decentralize health care back to the edges. Health emerges with a doctor/patient relationship, not with a state-controlled directive.

Newman (Question #8): What are some of your final recommendations to support the immune system?

Shiva: What the government is doing by limiting social interaction is anti-heath care and anti-health. Of importance is taking mega doses of both Vitamins A and C.

Iodine has been basically eliminated from our diets, which is so important for the development of healthy brains. Have your thyroid gland checked out with a THS test.

Your body is interconnected. Your MD doesn’t know much about the immune system. You might have to educate your doctor, and they might need to let go of their egos.

Modern medicine has been indoctrinated by the Chinese model in that there are 16 administrators to one doctor.

Following the questions, Dr. Shiva explained how he has spent his entire life understanding how the system works. This has been his journey, for without freedom the truth will never become known. If elected in November to the U.S. Senate from MA, Shiva’s priorities will be Truth, Freedom, and Heath.

Alex Newman is an award-winning international journalist, educator, author, and consultant who seeks to glorify God in everything he does, currently serving as a foreign correspondent for The New American.

American scientist, Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai was a Fulbright grant recipient who holds four degrees from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), including a Ph.D. in biological engineering. Shiva is running for U.S. Senate in MA. Check Shiva’s website to follow his campaign and to donate: Shiva4Senate.

Read here Part 1, published on Wednesday, April 22, 2002, at Illinois Review: Dr. Shiva Examines Medical Profit in the Coronavirus Age.

Friday, April 24, 2020 at 04:07 PM | Permalink

Comments
Comment below or sign in with Typepad Facebook Twitter and more…
powered by Typepad
Contact IR
Categories

Abortion
ACORN/SEIU
Brinkman’s Reviews
Campaign 2012
Campaign 2014
Campaign 2016
Campaign 2018
Campaign 2020
COVID-19
Di Leo columns
Durbin
Economy
Education
Energy & Environment
Family & Marriage
For the Good of Illinois PAC
Foreign Policy
Free Markets
Government Reform
Health Care
Hesham Shehab Columns
HPV Vaccination
Illinois Hall of Fame
Illinois politics
Immigration
Interviews
IR 2014 Candidate Survey bios
IR Reviews
Jobs & Labor
Legal Issues & Courts
Masters of Manufacturing
Media
Religion
Second Amendment
Taxes
War on Terrorism

Wednesday, April 22, 2020

Comments

Monday, April 13, 2020

Friday, April 10, 2020
Schlafly & Thorner: Family give Hulu’s take on conservative heroine Phyllis Schlafly a “C”

Screen Shot 2020-04-10 at 10.01.16 AM
By Andy Schlafly & Nancy Thorner –

The star-studded production of “Mrs. America,” a new miniseries about Phyllis Schlafly and her defeat of the Equal Rights Amendment in the 1970s, is the talk of television. Multiple Emmy awards are expected for this production about real-life personalities still familiar to many.

The visuals are stunning in this 9-part series to debut on the subscriber-based Hulu network on April 15. A second glance is needed at the images to determine if it is of a performer, or an actual photo of the historical figure, because the actresses are made up to look so similar to the real McCoys.

But Phyllis’s family was never consulted for this production, and the script is as shallow as a college skit. The content relies on hackneyed stereotypes that have no basis in truth about Phyllis or her family.

Falsehoods are glaring. It portrays Phyllis as wearing only a wedding band as a married man might, but not an engagement ring as Phyllis and traditional women always did.

One might infer from that and other parts of this script-as-told-by-liberals that Phyllis aspired to be a man, to succeed in a man’s world. Yet nothing would be further from the truth, as she opposed every attempt to make women more like men, or to secure slots for women in jobs traditionally held by men.

Cate Blanchett is cast well as Phyllis, featuring her trademark hairdo and similar facial features. The two-time Academy Award winner was also executive producer of this made-for-television series, bringing an uncommonly high level of talent to the small screen.

Usually the career path of performers is to excel on television with the hope of one day making the leap to Hollywood. Oscar winners rarely go in the opposite direction, from movies to television, but Blanchett agreed to do that for this once-in-a-lifetime role of Phyllis Schlafly.

The Australian Blanchett said she did not know who Phyllis was until she saw her endorse Donald Trump in March 2016, which propelled Trump to victory in the pivotal Missouri primary. When she passed away in 2016, news articles appeared worldwide indicating that she had many followers across the oceans, too, but apparently not Blanchett.

Her supporting cast are dead ringers for Phyllis’ political adversaries: Betty Friedan, Gloria Steinem, and Bella Abzug with her famous hats, and more.

But as fine an actress as Blanchett is, she fails to capture the feminine grace and charm which Phyllis maintained amid the fiercest of conflicts. She would often debate a nasty feminist in front of a hostile crowd of a thousand college students, and then enjoy a casual dinner afterwards as though nothing had happened.

Blanchett’s approach is a forced grin, but with Phyllis her smile was never forced or mean. She was a genuinely happy person, not because her life was easy, but because she was accomplishing what she understood to be better for our country.

The script, written by the Canadian Davhi Waller, acknowledges the immense talents of Phyllis to organize and lead. Waller has said that Phyllis “ was an incredibly effective grassroots organizer, and she was able to mobilize women. That was her superpower.”

But otherwise the script misses opportunities for its talented cast. With rich history available for this drama, it is disappointing that it instead resorts to stereotypical, completely fictional gender role-playing which everyone has seen on television before.

Completely false scenes of the husband commanding the wife, in this case Fred Schlafly supposedly domineering over Phyllis, are as old as Archie Bunker’s tiresome dialog in the sitcom “All in the Family” from the 70s. It was a joke, and everyone understood it as joke, when Phyllis would start a debate by thanking her husband for supposedly allowing her to attend.

A scene where Phyllis supposedly attended an insiders’ meeting with Barry Goldwater and other male politicians, who told her to take notes for the men, is another eye-roller. Goldwater himself was an outsider politically even in the Republican Party, and Phyllis neither mentioned any such incident nor would she have likely been offended by anything similar.

Then there is the entirely fictional “best friend” of Phyllis who is played by a talented actress but has no historical legitimacy. Why such prominence is given in a fact-based miniseries to a purely fanciful character is mystifying, and detracts from its value.

But the script nailed it by confirming that the Equal Rights Amendment died 40 years ago, and some liberals are unhappy about that because they want to pretend that ERA can be ratified today by Congress extending the deadline. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg agrees with Phyllis on this, however, telling the ERA proponents to start over.

“Mrs. America” gets a “C” for resorting to fictional stereotypes rather than trying harder to portray the sweet, engaging Phyllis.

Friday, April 10, 2020 at 10:10 AM | Permalink

Comments
Comment below or sign in with Typepad Facebook Twitter and more…
powered by Typepad
partnered with iPage
Contact IR
Categories

Abortion
ACORN/SEIU
Brinkman’s Reviews
Campaign 2012
Campaign 2014
Campaign 2016
Campaign 2018
Campaign 2020
COVID-19
Di Leo columns
Durbin
Economy
Education
Energy & Environment
Family & Marriage
For the Good of Illinois PAC
Foreign Policy
Free Markets
Government Reform
Health Care
Hesham Shehab Columns
HPV Vaccination
Illinois Hall of Fame
Illinois politics
Immigration
Interviews
IR 2014 Candidate Survey bios
IR Reviews
Jobs & Labor
Legal Issues & Courts
Masters of Manufacturing
Media
Religion
Second Amendment
Taxes
War on Terrorism

Main | How WHO Became China’s Coronavirus Accomplice »

Monday, April 06, 2020